|  |  Fire MappingGeodesyGroup and ITRES have teamed up to provide
      a fire mapping solution for ASRD to use within their wildfire management
      strategy. Wildfires and hotspots can be imaged from Geodesy’s aircraft
      using an ITRES TABI-1800 thermal IR sensor. The thermal imagery is then
      processed to produce thermal maps where active fire, burning areas, and
      isolated hotspots are evident. From the maps, vector spatial data products
      are derived. The deliverables are then provided to the ASRD ftp site by
      the required deadline.
 Infrared Scanning Equipment
 
 The thermal Infrared sensor that will be used is ITRES’ Thermal Airborne
      Broadband Imager (TABI-1800).
 
 The TABI-1800 imager has 1800 across-track pixels allowing wide swaths of
      ground to be imaged with each flightline. TABI-1800 imager has a broad
      spectral bandwidth that is sensitive to wavelengths between 3700 to 4800
      nm. The following tables summarize the main characteristics and
      specifications of the TABI-1800 sensor system.
 
 The height of the aircraft above ground level determines the across-track
      ground pixel resolution. Using GeodesyGroup’s aircraft the expected
      pixel resolution range is 10 cm to 2 m corresponding to 811 ft to 16225 ft
      above ground. Utilizing the 1800 across-track spatial pixels, this
      corresponds to a ground swath between 180 m to 3.6 km per flightline. The
      TABI-1800 is a ‘push-frame’ imager which implies that the along track
      pixel resolution is not governed by the speed of the aircraft. In other
      words, the plane can maintain a reasonable survey speed (150 knots is
      typical) regardless of doing low or high resolution imagery and still
      acquire square pixels.
 
 Other operational considerations for the TABI-1800 include the weather and
      environmental conditions in the survey area. While the TABI-1800 can see
      through most smoke, it cannot image through cloud. Thus, on any given
      night of operation, the cloud ceiling impacts the height of the plane and
      the corresponding ground pixel resolution of the imagery.
 
 As the manufacturer of the TABI-1800, ITRES is capable of diagnosing and
      repairing the system quickly.
 
 
  
 Image Capture
 
 The expected operational plan on any given night would be to have one
      flight with approximately 4 hours of survey time. Of course logistical
      details can affect the operational plan (airport locations, ferry to site,
      refueling options near the fires, etc.). The amount of data collected in a
      flight is not instrument limited; the TABI-1800 has the capacity to
      collect data for any given flight length.
 
 The TABI-1800 collects frames at a rate of 90 frames / second. This
      corresponds to approximately 50 GB per hour. The expected survey flights
      for fire-mapping would be at most 4 hours on line yielding up to 200 GB of
      data per flight.
 
 Image Processing
 
 Image processing involves three main steps: processing the raw imagery;
      mosaicking and georeferencing the imagery to produce a seamless thermal
      map of the survey block; and finally, extracting the necessary GIS spatial
      vector data products from the thermal map and producing mission summary
      reports.
 
 The raw TABI-1800 image processing involves correcting for additive signal
      components and applying calibration files to produce radiometrically
      corrected temperature files. In addition to the TABI-1800 imagery, the GPS
      and IMU data (that measures the aircraft position and attitude) from the
      flight is also processed and blended with the TABI-1800 imagery. Once all
      raw data is processed and the data streams blended, the flight line files
      are georeferenced and mosaicked together to produce thermal maps of the
      survey area. Different survey areas (i.e. different fires) would each have
      their own mosaic image map produced. The thermal maps are then analyzed
      and the necessary data products (hotspots, fire perimeters, burning areas,
      etc) are extracted.
 
 The benefits to the TABI-1800 thermal maps include the high degree of
      thermal detail due to the TABI-1800’s sensor sensitivity, and the very
      high spatial accuracy of the resulting map. However, the main processing
      limitation is the amount of time it takes to complete the processing
      steps. One reason for this is that the data processing cannot begin until
      the aircraft has landed. There is no cost effective means to transfer the
      raw data from the aircraft to the processing stations. However, we are
      proposing to incorporate some level of data transfer and primary
      processing in the aircraft. This would allow us to land with some steps in
      the processing chain already complete. Another factor contributing to our
      processing time is that the processing software does take time to process
      the large amounts of image data that is required to make the thermal maps.
      Our current plan requires approximately four hours of processing time
      after the flight to generate required deliverables and to upload ASRD.
 
 Digital Elevation Model Data
 
 DEMs are an essential data element for us to create the orthoimage product
      for this service. Last year we relied predominately on radarsat derived
      digital elevation models. They are by definition relatively coarse. SRD
      has available for internal use a variety of elevation data from different
      sources including high resolution Lidar for specific areas. As part of
      this proposal we’d ask, when the branch can, they make available DEM
      data to help provide for a better more accurate deliverable of map
      information.
 
 Delivery to ASRD
 
 The proposed delivery method for the required data products (imagery,
      vector spatial data, and summary report) to ASRD is via their ftp site.
      This will require field access to high-speed internet to enable acceptable
      transfer rates. If the field base for the ITRES/GeodesyGroup crew for a
      particular fire is in a location that has reliable high-speed internet,
      then the field base (i.e. hotel) internet access will probably be
      sufficient. However, there is no guarantee that the hotel internet will be
      available on some morning when data delivery is needed. Furthermore, the
      crew could potentially be stationed in a location where reliable and fast
      internet is not available.
 
 We propose that our field crews could upload the data with support from
      ASRD. This could entail ASRD setting up a dedicated secure laptop that
      would have clearance to connect to the internal ASRD network, and that
      approved ITRES/GeodesyGroup personal could coordinate with local fire
      offices to have access to upload the data. This approach ensures the data
      can be transferred quickly and efficiently on a reliable and fast internal
      network to ASRD, but at the same time ensuring the security of the
      internal ASRD computer network.
 
   |  |